In undergraduate school, I remember one professor marveling at various features of brain functioning and talking about the reasons that a particular function evolved. It was just as easy, or easier, for me to think of reasons that these features were designed into the system. In my first class on physiological psychology, the professor did not have an evolutionary bent that I could tell, and merely marveled at the function and complexity of the brain. I think many students are unprepared for the naturalistic worldview, and that this often can trigger a crisis of faith. In their book, God Attachment, Clinton and Straub (2010)1 note that people often enter adulthood with the same views they had with their faith that they learned in early childhood. In other words, they have not developed a more mature faith that allows them to have an understanding of the problem of evil, the existence of many different religions, and the evolutionary viewpoint (a view espousing the all-powerfulness of useful accidents). Thus, they are setting themselves up for a crisis of faith that will inevitably come with real-world life experiences and the hard knocks that life delivers. I frequently encounter people who become sort of paralyzed in that crisis of faith without attempting to find answers to their questions. They will often just resign themselves to somewhat of a wishy-washy stance like, “I’m not sure I believe everything in the Bible. I believe, but I’m just not sure about X.” When asked, they’ll admit they’ve never tried to resolve the issue with learning more about the subject. So, they end up assuming a distant stance with God on the basis of a particular issue that they have not taken the time to resolve.
I don’t think people have to believe that Genesis is literally true to be saved. I don’t think there is anything in the Bible that would suggest that. But I do think it is possible to be logically consistent and hold an intelligent worldview encompassing a literal account of Genesis. Frankly, I think a literal account of Genesis leads to the most logically consistent stance in explaining the problem of evil in the world (i.e., the fall). Also, one only needs a vaguely possible scenario to explain certain observations (apparent age of the Earth and Universe) to make this tenable. If God is all-powerful, then He could have done it. I’m not advocating a kind of “God did it” approach to science, but I am rather asking believers to explore the issue in more depth and to develop a more mature way of viewing their faith. This can help believers have a more mature relationship with God.
I would also caution creationists against the view of saying that people who advocate for evolution are liars. Evolution contains many lies, but to lie involves intent to deceive. There are times when they do likely lie, but it’s better to be careful about this. I’d rather look at it as a worldview, which I think contains many untruths. It’s understandable, just false.
I urge fellow believers, and those with doubts, to more fully explore these issues in order to develop a more mature faith—a faith which can stand up to the complexities of the world and the problem of evil in the world. More personally, it will help with the very difficult things that you face in your own life and promote a deeper connection with God.
Filed under: Creationism, education, evolution, Intelligent Design, logic, naturalism, psychology, theology | Tagged: Christianity, complexity, Creationism, psychology, YEC, Young Earth Creationism | 14 Comments »