I have set up an independently hosted blog: www.intelldesign.com. Please refer there for all future posts and comments. There are a couple of the most recent comments that didn’t get imported.
Filed under: Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »
I have set up an independently hosted blog: www.intelldesign.com. Please refer there for all future posts and comments. There are a couple of the most recent comments that didn’t get imported.
Filed under: Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »
And then did there exist a “warm little pond, with all sorts of ammonia and phosphoric salts, light, heat, electricity, &c., present, that a proteine (sic) compound was chemically formed ready to undergo still more complex changes, at the present day such matter would be instantly absorbed, which would not have been the case before [...]
Filed under: Intelligent Design, evolution, science | Tagged: fairy tale, Intelligent Design, naturalism, naturalistic, naturalistic evolution, science | 2 Comments »
And then was there thought for a long time to be a giant impact upon the Earth that resulted in the moon. (1) Or later, perhaps not. (2) Indeed, the Earth was in fact very different from today. There were no oceans and no oxygen. Then was the Earth bombarded by [...]
Filed under: Creationism, Intelligent Design, cosmology, evolution, science | Tagged: cosmology, Creationism, earth, earth history, evolution, moon, naturalism, naturalistic, science | 2 Comments »
Some commentators read my general overviews, and they assume that I don’t know the basic cosmological views, such as the cosmological view of the starlight and time problem. However, I have been reading about cosmology for the last 16 years or so, and I am quite acquainted with how the views on cosmology “have [...]
Filed under: Creationism, Intelligent Design, evolution, science, theology | Tagged: Christianity, cosmology, creation science, Creationism, evolution, God, science, theology | 3 Comments »
In Part II, I laid out an overview of Young Earth Creationism (YEC), and in Part III, I began addressing some of the controversy with YEC. I will continue addressing the controversy and potential problems with YEC in this post.
Radiocarbon Dating
Radiocarbon dating is used for dating the age of fossils or formerly living matter [...]
Filed under: Creationism, Intelligent Design, cosmology, evolution, science, theology | Tagged: carbon 14, creation science, Creationism, evolution, great flood, naturalism, old earth creationism, radiocarbon, science, starlight, uniformitarian, YEC, Young Earth Creationism | 44 Comments »
In Part II, I gave a basic summary of the view of Young Earth Creationism. In this section, I’ll discuss some of the controversies.
Catastrophe versus Uniformitarianism
That naturalist viewpoint is that the rate at which geological and other natural processes occur today, is the rate at which these things have always occurred (geological changes, formation [...]
Filed under: Creationism, Intelligent Design, evolution, science | Tagged: creation science, Creationism, evolution, geology, naturalism, radiometric, radiometric dating, science, uniformitarian | 4 Comments »
This view of creationism rests on a literal interpretation of the Bible. The notion is that the Earth was created 6000-10000 years ago. The dating is based on the genealogy listed in the chapter Numbers in the Bible. This perspective says that uniformitarian interpretations of geology and cosmology are incorrect or misinterpreted. [...]
Filed under: Creationism, Intelligent Design, Religion, cosmology, evolution, science, theology | Tagged: Bible, creation, Creationism, evil, evolution, great flood, Intelligent Design, Noah's flood, science, suffering, theology, YEC, Young Earth Creationism | 9 Comments »
Dwilli, my co-author has written a series of posts about the book, In Six Days : Why Fifty Scientists Choose to Believe in Creation.
1. “The Alpha and Omega…”
2. “Abundant Life”
3. “Abundant Life” II
Filed under: Creationism, science, theology | Tagged: Creationism, science, scientists, theology | Leave a Comment »
Hallmarks of Design
I’ve written before about how things that are designed exhibit function or specific complexity. I’ll give a definition in a bit more detail here.
Systems that are of high complexity, that is functionally integrated multicomponent systems, systems that are of high specificity where only one or very few of many possible arrangements of these [...]
Filed under: Intelligent Design, evolution, science | Tagged: Behe, darwin, darwinism, dembski, evolution, Intelligent Design, naturalism, philosphy, science | 7 Comments »
The Christian Scribbler has written an interesting post on the macro level of irreducible complexity. Kliska writes:
I’m in the middle of a book titled: In Six Days; Why Fifty Scientists Choose to Believe in Creation (Ashton, 2000). All the chapters (which are composed by the different scientists giving their reasons) have been informative and interesting, [...]
Filed under: Creationism, Intelligent Design, evolution | Tagged: biodiversity, Creationism, ecology, evolution, Intelligent Design | Leave a Comment »