Comment at Darwin's God, from naturalism to paganism to superstition

It seems as if the authors know that if someone logically rejects the most socially accepted (to the point of being expected) form of superstition [i.e. Christianity], then there is little hope for their new agey, short half-life, money-making drone memes to hook in. Not really, whatever things “seem” like to you historical facts show [...]

Comment at Darwin's God III

Please tell us how you would treat an infection if on the whim of some supernatural entity an antibiotic that was 100% safe and effective on one day became a deadly poison to humans the next? The reason that science and medicine as we know it in the West arose is because of the “Jewish [...]

Comment at Darwin's God II

You explain convincingly why there is no alternative to methodological naturalism. The irony of the notion of methodological naturalism is that it only makes sense if its falsification, i.e. supernaturalism might actually be detected in some way. Yet its proponents argue that this is impossible as a matter of principle and surround this claim with [...]

Comment at Darwin's God

I assume you don’t think it would be a good option to pursue supernatural causes in medicine. Perhaps you do not have to pursue them, as they might arise naturally. Or is that simply impossible? After all, we already admit to transphysical causes and transcendent realities in medicine all the time. It is by our [...]