My experience with Wikipedia is that editors will censor criticism of Darwinism or even historical facts which tend to put Darwinism in a bad light. For example, mentioning Darwin here was censored:
Dawidowicz’ allegations and positions are criticized and not accepted by most historians however. For example, in “Studying the Jew” Alan Steinweis notes that, “Old-fashioned antisemitism, Hitler argued, was insufficient, and would lead only to progroms, which contribute little to a permanent solution. This is why, Hitler maintained, it was important to promote ‘an antisemitism of reason,’ one that acknowledged the racial basis of Jewry.” Interviews with Nazis by other historians show that the Nazis thought that their views were rooted in biology, not historical prejudices. For example, “S. became a missionary for this biomedical vision… As for anti-Semitic attitudes and actions, he insisted that “the racial question… [and] resentment of the Jewish race… had nothing to do with medieval anti-Semitism…” That is, it was all a matter of scientific biology and of community.” As another stated, “Our whole cultural life for decades has been more or less under the influence of biological thinking, as it was begun particularly around the middle of the last century, by the teachings of Darwin…”
The way that the original article was written Medieval anti-Semitism was to blame for the Holocaust (despite what the Nazis themselves said) and Medieval anti-Semitism was largely the fault of Martin Luther. Even after some corrections Martin Luther still receives more attention in the entry than Darwin does yet it is a historical fact that the Nazis said that their beliefs had more to do with Darwin and science than Martin Luther and religion.
Their entry on Intelligent Design demonstrates the same type of distortions combined with the omission of important facts. To read their first paragraph on Intelligent Design one would think that all one needs to known about ID is that a group of American creationists invented the concept in the late 1900s for purely political reasons. Or some such nonsense.
Filed under: Uncategorized |